It's primarily transport stuff with a one button "do over" function. It's stored in one big XML file, but with the LM Remote KeyMap program, you can very easily assign any key on the remote to transmit any keystroke, or keystroke sequence. IOW, when I'm running Sonar, all the buttons have Sonar keystroke assigned to them, and when I'm running Reaper, all the buttons send out Reaper keystrokes. I use the freeware program LM Remote KeyMap with my lets you create profiles for all your multimedia apps, and recognizes them when the program has focus. Do you use a Firefly "profile" to control Sonar? If so, do you have one you could share, to get us started? I don't like mixing with a control surface, as I prefer to use envelopes, but I can run all the transport functions with it. It can compete on many levels with other DAW’s, but for me it doesn’t compete with what Cubase now has to offer, if I had been asked any question regarding Cubase when I was lecturing In sound engineer. The remote is RF wireless so you don't have to have line of sight, and I can run all the controls I need with it. Answer (1 of 2): Reaper is a very customizable DAW, and it costs a fraction of other DAW’s. I have the big "Firefly" button setup in both Sonar and in Reaper to do a "stop/rewind/undo/and punch back into record". The Firefly remote I'm holding works with both Sonar and Reaper. You have to compare with DP, FL Studio, Reaper or any sequencer that can load Audio Unit componets, not VST componets. I use digital drums in my home studio, and my control surface fits in my hand. This means that Reaper is usable for virtually anyone who needs a DAW while still providing just as many, if not more, features as any other DAW on the market. Audio Unit V2/V3 technology is completely different from VST2/VST3 technology, so you cant make that comparision with Cubase. I looked in to Pro Tools and it looks like I could use their large control surface in the control room and a smaller one near my drums and run a patch bay or parallel the drum tracks to record in both places. How do I go about this? Does Reaper work with HW control surfaces? Can I remote some of the surface or control? For my drums would I be better off having a smaller set up near them and then importing the files to the master studio? Another thing is I want to be able to control the recording from my drum kit as well as my control room and probably several other areas in the studio. (SW back up on a large monitor would be great or to use it for some manipulation especially after the basic tracks are recorded). I also want to be able to run a control surface - I do not want to manipulate a SW DAW - at least for the basic track recording. As my kit is large and I want to be able to run a lot of spot miking on the kit as well as have enough tracks for a wide array of instrument and vocal sources I know I need more than 16 simultaneous tracks. I am doing my research on designing a studio I intend to build. Glennbo - I saw your photos and figured you could help me
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |